Term |
Definition |
| |
N.B. Words within 'apostrophes' are defined within the glossary. |
| A (back to top) |
|
| A-H (uptake) pathway |
The eight step pathway used within the Renewable Natural Resources Research Strategy ('RNRRS') to characterise the process that leads from the conduct of research to the uptake of 'research products' by end users to their economic benefit. The pathway was also used to monitor and assess project progress towards uptake.
|
| |
Step A |
Formal or informal agreement with stakeholders including collaborating and target institutions [to undertake the research] |
| Step B |
Generation of relevant research results (outputs delivered) |
Step C |
Development of appropriate research based products through adaptation/packaging |
| Step D |
Promotion of products into target institutions |
| Step E |
Adoption of products by target institutions |
| Step F |
Application of products and replication of results in target institution programmes |
| Step G |
Promotion of technology and/or behavioural change among end users by target institutions |
Step H |
Adoption of technology and/or other research products by end users and generation of economic benefits i.e. developmental impact (purpose delivered). |
|
Altiplano |
Highlands / high plateau (Bolivia). |
| B (back to top) |
|
| Bari; bariland |
Hillside terraced dryland field (Nepal). |
Best Practice Guidelines (SEM)
|
Guidelines to 'natural resources' (NR) researchers on the use of socio-economic research methods.
|
| C (back to top) |
|
Chaco |
Arid lowlands (Bolivia). |
| Char; charland |
Riverine island in the floodplains (Bangladesh). |
| Concept Note |
The first stage in the application process for NRSP research project funding, comprising a brief outline of the key features of the proposed research. |
Conceptual Impact Model (CIM) |
NRSP's model of 'uptake promotion' of 'research products' for 'developmental impact'. The model identifies 5 generic 'stakeholder domains', Domains V, W, X, Y and Z, that specify the beneficiaries/stakeholders with whom NRSP can achieve or make progress towards developmental impact. From 2002 onwards, the CIM underlaid NRSP's uptake promotion strategy.
|
| |
| Domain V |
Primary stakeholders/ultimate beneficiaries of a project in the target site of the project. |
| Domain W |
Intermediate/secondary stakeholders, located near or in the target site(s) of a project, who are well informed about a project and may (ideally) be project partners. |
| Domain X |
National level target institutions (NTIs) in the target country where a project is located. |
| Domain Y |
International level target institutions (ITIs) to whom a project and the programme can readily disseminate research findings and products through publications and other media channels. |
| Domain Z |
Primary stakeholders/ultimate beneficiaries located in non-project sites in the target and non-target countries, together with local intermediate/secondary stakeholders. |
|
| Country |
NRSP projects were sited in:
Bangladesh, Bolivia, Botswana, Brazil, Caribbean, Ethiopia, Ghana, Honduras, India, Indonesia, Kenya, Malawi, Namibia, Nepal, Nigeria, Sri Lanka, Sudan, Tanzania, Uganda, Vietnam and Zimbabwe.
Countries in bold are those in which NRSP concentrated its resources following budget cuts in 2002.
|
| D (back to top) |
|
Delivery (of research findings and results) |
The act of placing 'research findings' and results in public domain locations (physical and virtual) in accessible 'media' forms that are appropriate for their use by stakeholders.
|
Developmental impact |
Enduring changes (e.g. in livelihoods, policies, institutions, processes or resources) resulting from research project outputs and outcomes. These may be positive or negative, local or non-local.
|
| Driver (of change) |
To be added |
Domain (for uptake) |
A generic group or category of stakeholders with whom the project and/or the programme must engage in order to attain an 'output' objective and to contribute to attainment of the purpose.
|
Domain V |
In the 'Conceptual Impact Model', the primary stakeholders/ultimate beneficiaries of a project in the target site of the project. |
| Domain W |
In the 'Conceptual Impact Model', the intermediate/secondary stakeholders, located near or in the target sites(s) of a project, who are well informed about a project and may (ideally) be project partners. |
| Domain X |
In the 'Conceptual Impact Model', the national level target institutions (NTIs) in the target country where a project is located. |
| Domain Y |
In the 'Conceptual Impact Model', the international level target institutions (ITIs) to whom a project and the programme can readily disseminate research findings and products through publications and other media channels. |
| Domain Z |
In the 'Conceptual Impact Model', the primary stakeholders/ultimate beneficiaries located in non-project sites in a target and non-target countries together with local intermediate/secondary stakeholders. |
| E (back to top) |
|
| |
|
| F (back to top) |
|
Footprint |
What NRSP leaves behind in terms of knowledge, attitudes and practices. |
Fundaciones |
Foundation (Bolivia). |
| G (back to top) |
|
| |
|
| H (back to top) |
|
| |
|
| I (back to top) |
|
| Impact |
Enduring changes (e.g. in livelihoods, policies, institutions, processes or resources) resulting from research project outputs and outcomes. These may be positive or negative, local or non-local. |
| Impact pathway |
The sequence of activities for the 'uptake promotion' of specified 'research products', implemented by the project and specified stakeholders, to achieve impact.
|
Integrated management of natural resources |
Integrated management of NRs covers three inter-related fields: a holistic view of the NR base itself (for NRSP, these are landforms, soil, water, vegetation and organic residues); the integrated and dynamic nature of people's livelihood strategies and how these affect their decision-making and capacity to use and manage the NR base; and the institutional environment in which NR management strategies are designed and implemented. |
International Target Institution (ITI) |
Within 'CIM', an international level institution targeted by a research project for 'research product' 'uptake promotion'.
|
| J (back to top) |
|
| |
|
| K (back to top) |
|
| |
|
| L (back to top) |
|
Livelihood assets |
Material and social resources (assets) that can be used by individuals or groups to sustain or improve their livelihoods. Assets are often divided into five types (human, social, natural, physical and financial) and may be tangible (stores and resources) or intangible (claims and access).
|
| Local Target Intstitution (LTI) |
Within 'CIM', a local level institution targeted by a research project for 'research product' 'uptake promotion'. |
Logframe;
Logical Framework Approach / Matrix |
The Logical Framework Approach is an analytical managment tool that helps planners and managers to: analyse the existing situation during project preparation; establish a logical hierarchy of means (inputs, activities, output, purpose) by which project objectives will be reached; identify potential risks; establish how 'outputs' and 'outcomes' will best be monitored and evaluated; and present a summary of the project in a standard format, ie the Logframe matrix. |
| M (back to top) |
|
Media forms (for research products)
|
The various ways (or channels) by which the content of a specified 'research product' is communicated to the various stakeholders who need to be aware of the product. For example, hard copy guidelines, videos, briefing pamphlets, face-to-face discussions; electronic databases and conferences.
|
Micro Action Planning |
A participatory action research method, that enables the community to assess the implicatons and outcomes of community forestry (Nepal). |
| Mid(dle) Hills |
Mid-altitude Himalayan foothills (900m - 1800m asl in Nepal). |
mul , mol |
manure (Nepal). |
| N (back to top) |
|
National Target Institution (NTI)
|
Within 'CIM', a national level institution targeted by a research project for 'research product' 'uptake promotion'.
|
Natural resources |
NRSP research focused on landforms, soil, water (fresh and marine), vegetation and organic residues. Livestock and fish were addressed respectively by the Livestock Production Programme and Fisheries Management Science Programme.
|
| Node (Uptake Node) |
From 2002, NRSP projects were grouped around eight "nodes". Seven of these were geographic (Bangladesh, Bolivia, Caribbean, Eastern Africa, Ghana, India, Nepal) and the eighth was system based (Peri-Urban Interface (PUI)). The concept behind these node groupings was that the commonality and synergy between the different 'production systems' projects in each node could be capitalised upon to enhance the effectiveness of 'uptake promotion' activities and research 'impact'.
|
| Node: suite (or suites) |
Projects within each 'node' were clustered into three node: suites (or suites) around a common research area and common regional, national and international level ('Domain X and Y') sectoral stakeholders. Suite titles were specific to each node (e.g. Nepal: suite 2: Linking field activities to policy; Bangladesh: suite 3: Integrated floodplain management). As for the nodes, the expectation was that this clustering of projects could enhance the effectiveness of 'uptake promotion' activities and research 'impact'. Projects within a node that provide context to the node:suite research but are not closely associated with any of the node: suites are allocated to Suite 0: Background.
|
| O (back to top) |
|
| Other node |
The node that contains NRSP projects that are positioned outside the 8 'uptake promotion' nodes. These projects are grouped by research 'Topic Cluster'. |
Outcomes |
Who a project affected, where and how. |
Outputs |
What a project produced e.g. findings, messages, and products. Within a 'logframe matrix', the project activities lead to the project outputs as the third level within the planning hierarchy. See also 'Research outputs' below.
|
| P (back to top) |
|
Production System |
The Renewable Natural Resources Research Strategy ('RNRRS') specified six target renewable natural resources (RNR) production systems that cut across the RNR research programmes. NRSP projects covered all six production systems. These are the:
Forest agriculture interface (FAI), High potential systems (HP), Hillsides systems (HS), Land water interface (LWI), Peri-urban interface (PUI) and Semi-arid systems (SA). |
Promotion of uptake of research products (or Uptake Promotion, UP) |
Planned activities for information delivery that facilitate the use of specific 'research products' by particular stakeholders, including personnel of developmental organisations, meso- and apex policy level actors and poor people themselves. Communication is seen as central to effective uptake promotion.
|
Pro-poor |
Research or 'uptake promotion' activities conducted and delivered in ways that are designed to benefit the poor. |
| Q (back to top) |
|
| |
|
| R (back to top) |
|
RD1 |
Within the RNRRS, the research and development funding application. |
RNRRS |
The Renewable Natural Resources Research Stategy of the UK Department for International Development (DFID). NRSP was one of the 10 RNR research programmes funded through the RNRRS from 1995-2006. |
| Research call |
An invitation to submit a 'concept note' for a particular research 'theme' or topic |
Research findings |
The interpretation of 'research results', including their refinement into specific 'research products'. |
Research outputs |
The planned changes that a research project considers it can achieve within the project term and which are specified in the third planning (output) level of its 'logframe matrix'.
|
Research products |
Findings and results of research, e.g. methods; conceptual models; decision-making aids; recommendations; scientific understanding delivered in various accessible forms; technical information; transferable technologies; sets of alternatives from which end-users choose. |
Research results |
The qualitative and quantitative data arising from conducting research. |
Research uptake |
Change in the knowledge, attitudes and practices (KAP) of target organisations, groups or individuals, arising from access to and use of 'research products'.
|
| S (back to top) |
|
Scaling-up |
More quality benefits to more people over a wider geographical area more quickly, more equitably and more lastingly (IIRR, 2000. Going to scale: Can we bring more benefits to more people, more quickly? Silang, Cavite, Philippines: International Institute of Rural Reconstruction.)
|
Stakeholder domain |
A generic group or category of stakeholders with whom the project and/or the programme must engage in order to attain an 'output' objective and to contribute to attainment of the purpose
|
| Suite (Node: suite) |
Projects within each 'node' were clustered into three node: suites (or suites) around a common research area and common national and international level ('Domain X and Y') sectoral stakeholders. Suite titles were specific to each node (e.g. Nepal: suite 2: Linking field activities to policy; Bangladesh: suite 3: Integrated floodplain management). As for the project nodes, the expectation was that this clustering of projects could enhance the effectiveness of 'uptake promotion' activities and research' impact'. Projects within a node that provide context to the node:suite research but are not closely associated with any of the node: suites are allocated to Suite 0: Background. |
| Synthesis study |
RNRRS studies that were conducted during 2005-6 to synthesise the project and programme experiences and lessons to be learnt across a number of cross-cutting themes. NRSP managed 5 synthesis studies: Common pool resources; Policy and policy process; Peri-urban interface; Communication for uptake promotion; and Adaptive capacity for climate change.
|
| System |
For the purposes of NRSP, a system is defined as an assemblage of inter-related parts that can deliver useful outputs, over a long period of time, if it is provided with some inputs from within or outside the system. The inter-related parts are: people; their resources, particularly the NRs which they access and manage; and the institutions that influence the ways by which the system’s inputs are obtained and its outputs are achieved. Since the parts are inter-related, efforts to improve a system (i.e., achieve better outputs using the same or different inputs) are likely to change the relationships between the system’s parts and may even change the parts that comprise the system.
|
| Systems approach |
Applying a systems approach to NR research requires the research team to have the capacity to appreciate and accommodate the complexity of a system’s parts and their inter-relationships; to address the details of the system with which they are working, for example migration patterns of the population, market opportunities and social determinants of behaviour; and to predict and/or observe the consequences of changing the system in order to give advantage to the part(s) of the system that the research addresses (e.g. reducing soil erosion or enhancing crop yields). |
| T (back to top) |
|
Target Institutions |
Target institutions are those local, national or international level formal or informal institutions that take up, utilise or transfer the products of research to achieve 'developmental impact'. Target institutions may be the end users of 'research products'. |
Terai |
Southern lowlands of Nepal, including the Gangetic Plain and river valleys |
Theme;
Research theme |
These 'themes' specify the topics for which NRSP contributes new knowledge on transacting change in the integrated management of natural resources. The nine themes apply across all six 'production systems' and are:
|
| |
~ |
Enriching livelihood knowledge in relation to NR management |
~ |
Efficacy of participation in decision-making for reaching the poor
|
~ |
Bridging knowledge gaps in the adoption process
|
~ |
Better information for pro-poor service delivery
|
~ |
Livelihoods knowledge for pro-poor policy dialogue
|
~ |
Linking households and communities with policy makers
|
~ |
Institutional constraints to integrated NR management and options for change
|
~ |
Piloting new strategies for pro-poor NR management
|
~ |
Strategies for scaling-up research findings.
|
|
| |
Projects may address a single theme but more commonly they address several themes. For a project to cover a theme the project is expected to deliver a research product for the named theme. Delivery of research products on the themes provide the OVIs for outputs 1 and 2 of the 'NRSP Logframe'. |
Tole
|
Hamlet (Nepal). |
Topic Cluster |
A group of projects clustered by research topic and not included within NRSP's 2002 uptake promotion strategy and uptake nodes. |
Tracking |
Record keeping during the life of a project or programme that enables the research team to review and report on its activities. The records can be expanded to include a reflection on the quality of activity, feedback from stakeholders; and an assessment of progress and can contribute to the documentation of a project’s organisational learning.
|
Tropico humido |
Humid tropics (Bolivia). |
| U (back to top) |
|
| Uptake pathway |
The eight step pathway used within the 'RNRRS' to characterise the process that leads from the conduct of research to the uptake of 'research products' by end users to their economic benefit. The pathway was also used to monitor and assess project progress towards uptake.
|
| |
| Step A |
Formal or informal agreement with collaborating and target institutions [to undertake the research]. |
| Step B |
Generation of relevant research results (outputs delivered). |
| Step C |
Development of appropriate research based products through adaptation/packaging. |
| Step D |
Promotion of products into target institutions. |
| Step E |
Adoption of products by target institutions. |
| Step F |
Application and replication of results in target institution programmes. |
| Step G |
Promotion of technology and/or behavioural change among end users by target institutions. |
Step H |
Adoption of technology by end users and generation of economic benefits i.e. developmental impact (purpose delivered). |
|
Uptake promotion |
Planned activities for information delivery that facilitate the use of specific 'research products' by particular stakeholders, including personnel of developmental organisations, meso- and apex policy level actors and poor people themselves. Communication is seen as central to effective uptake promotion.
|
Uptake Promotion Node |
From 2002, NRSP projects were grouped around eight 'nodes'. Seven of these were geographic (Bangladesh, Bolivia, Caribbean, Eastern Africa, Ghana, India, Nepal) and the eighth was system based (Peri-Urban Interface (PUI)). The concept behind these node groupings was that the commonality and synergy between the different 'production systems' projects within each node could be capitalised upon to enhance the effectiveness of 'uptake promotion' activities and research 'impact'.
|
| V (back to top) |
|
Valle |
Valley (Bolivia). |
| W (back to top) |
|
| |
|
| X (back to top) |
|
| |
|
| Y (back to top) |
|
| |
|
| Z (back to top) |
|
| |
|